Group 1 - Chapter 6. Case 7. (Post for Iko Tumangan)

Williams vs. the City of Montgomery

Groups Decision:

In this case two white firefighters convicted of felonies were discharged; however, they were reinstated. A black firefighter was fired, but he was not reinstated. Williams sued the city of Montgomery claiming that disparate treatment under the civil rights act took place. Policies stated that firefighters convicted of felonies could not work for the city. The city of Montgomery was not given absolute immunity.

We agree with the court’s decision. We think that policies should be applied uniformly to avoid situations where even an unintentional bias may take place. We are unsure if the courts looked into the degree of the felonies received by the Williams and the other two firefighters, but despite the facts Williams should have been granted close to equal treatment or opportunity for reinstatement. This is lesson in upholding policies and doing it steadfastly so that situations like these don’t arise   

Courts Decision:

“The City and Board contend that they are entitled to a jury trial. The district court's decision holding that the City and Board were not entitled to a jury trial is correct. Williams requested backpay which is an equitable remedy not requiring determination by a jury. The Board and the City, therefore, are not entitled to a jury trial on the Title VII claim.” 

Williams wins this case against the defendant and according to the courts decisions discrimination under title VII took place. Williams is entitled to back pay.