Baker was not in violation of her Title VII rights under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In order for her to qualify for sexual discrimination, she must meet the following criteria:
A. that she is a member of a class (non-homosexual) protected by Title VII
B. that she was qualified for the position or rank sought
C. that she was denied tenure or reappointment; and
D. that in cases of re-appointment or tenure others with similar qualifications were reappointed or granted tenure.
Group Decision:
Our group decided that even though Baker met the first and third requirement, however she did not fulfill the second and fourth requirements. She was not fully qualified for reappointment and that she was also replaced by a candidate with more qualifications of which she lacked. Roundball was able to coach and teach and therefore was more qualified than Baker, fully justifying her termination. After referencing the case, our group was correct in our hypothesis and our decision was synonymous with the district court.
I agree with the court and the group. More Science High School is not guilty of violating Title VII's prohibition on gender discrimination. History teacher, Baker, was denied renewal of her teaching contract after her third year of employment and a poor evaluation.
ReplyDeleteIt makes sense for More Science High School to employ a qualified history teacher who could also coach the boys' basketball team than resign a less than satisfactory teacher and hire a new coach.
Baker was not replaced because of her gender, but rather her lack of qualifications for the position. So, she cannot argue that the high school was discriminating her because of her gender.